瑜伽師地論略纂 3.30

3.30

為是常相，無常相者，三世共有，故名共相。若常相者，假說徵詰，非正彼宗。量云：汝宗五蘊應不墮三世，許常相故，如無為等。　若無常相，三世恒有，亦不應理。量云：汝宗五蘊非於三世恒是實有，無常相故，如兔角等。　若言表詮無常，非遮詮者，量云：五蘊諸法非三世恒有，世所攝故，如幻事。七

Regarding whether it is a permanent characteristic or an impermanent characteristic: it is shared across the three times, so it is called a common characteristic. If it is a permanent characteristic, this is a hypothetical cross-examination, not their actual school. The formal inference is: "The five skandhas in your school should not fall into the three times; because you accept that their characteristic is permanent; like the unconditioned." If it is an impermanent characteristic, that they are constantly existent across the three times also does not stand to reason. The formal inference is: "The five skandhas in your school are not constantly and substantially existent across the three times; because their characteristic is impermanent; like the horns of a hare." If they say this is an affirmative statement of impermanence and not an exclusion, the formal inference is: "The dharmas of the five skandhas are not constantly existent across the three times; because they are subsumed under the temporal periods; like an illusion." Under the objection