瑜伽師地論略纂 4.130

4.130

八、四句分別中，非必是支，汎說彼故。無明第二句，不說有覆無記別報業果者，略故；次第二句，不說有覆無記識亦爾。　「或有是愛非受為緣，謂希求勝解脫，及依善愛而捨餘愛」者，善法欲類，名希解脫愛。　及一切善愛厭捨貪愛者，非順愛受為緣故生。非愛俱時及先無受，無順愛受故，說非為緣，不相違也。理實此中應順後句：諸是愛者，必緣受生。有受為緣而非是愛，謂後餘支。

Eighth, in the fourfold analysis: they need not necessarily be links, as they are spoken of broadly. In the second proposition for ignorance, not mentioning the indeterminate-obscured distinct retribution of karmic fruits is due to abbreviation; in the subsequent second proposition, not mentioning indeterminate-obscured consciousness is likewise so. Regarding "Or there may be craving that is not conditioned by feeling, namely seeking superior liberation and abandoning other cravings based on wholesome craving": the class of desire for wholesome dharmas is termed craving that seeks liberation. As for all wholesome craving that dispassionately abandons greedy craving, it does not arise conditioned by feeling that conforms to craving. It is not that feeling is absent simultaneously with or prior to craving; because there is no feeling that conforms to craving, it is said not to be a condition, so there is no contradiction. In principle, here it should conform to the latter proposition: whatever is craving is necessarily produced conditioned by feeling; there are feelings serving as conditions that are not craving, namely the remaining subsequent links.