瑜伽師地論略纂 4.29

4.29

「施自性者，謂思所起能捨所施物身業語業」者，《對法》、《唯識》俱取三業，思并無貪為性，今以無貪說為因緣，以思說在等起門中，故自性中取身語業。據表外彰，三乘通論，故唯身語，不說意業。戒自性中，以三業為性，故言身語業等。如《唯識》說：受菩薩戒故，通三業。　「依處，通情非情」者，性戒、遮戒，隨其所應，通依二故。

Regarding “The intrinsic nature of giving is the bodily and vocal karma produced by intention that can relinquish objects given”: The Abhidharma-samuccaya and the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi both take the three karmas, taking intention together with non-attachment as the nature. Here, non-attachment is stated as the causal condition, and intention is mentioned under the aspect of co-arising; therefore, within intrinsic nature, bodily and vocal karma are taken. In terms of external manifestation, discussing it generally across the three vehicles, only body and speech are mentioned, not mental karma. In the intrinsic nature of morality, the three karmas are taken as its nature, so it says “bodily and vocal karma, etc.” As stated in the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi, because one undertakes the bodhisattva precepts, it applies to all three karmas. Regarding “The bases extend to both sentient and insentient”: Because natural morality and prescriptive morality, as appropriate, extend to both bases.