瑜伽師地論略纂 5.61

5.61

八、依身起者，後五解脫，三界身起，許無色界起滅定故。初三解脫，有義：唯欲起，由教力故。《瑜伽》第十二云：由二因緣，名為有色，謂生欲界故。有義：不然，通二界起。初修解脫，遍處為果，必在欲界，如前道理；後成滿時，遍處為因，解脫為果，何妨色界亦得後起？豈生色界不得名有色而不修通耶？

Eighth, arising based on physical embodiment: The latter five deliverances arise based on embodiments in the three realms, since it is accepted that the attainment of cessation can be aroused in the formless realm. Regarding the first three deliverances, there is an opinion that they arise solely in the desire [realm], on account of scriptural authority. Fascicle twelve of the Yogācārabhūmi says: due to two causes and conditions it is called "having form," namely being born in the desire realm. There is an opinion that this is not so; they arise across both realms. When initially cultivating the deliverances, the stations of totality are their fruit, which must be in the desire realm, as in the previous principle; later, when they are perfected, the stations of totality serve as the cause and the deliverances as the fruit, so what prevents them from also being aroused later in the form realm? Could it be that one born in the form realm cannot be called "having form" and thus does not cultivate supernormal powers?