瑜伽師地論略纂 5.84

5.84

一、名差別。七十二及《顯揚》第二說若無差別，總說為空、無願、無相，通聞、思、修所成為性，有漏、無漏，若定若散，唯善非餘，加行非生得；若言空、無相、無願三摩地者，唯修所成，有漏、無漏，唯定非散；若言空解脫門等者，唯是無漏，修所成慧，非散聞、思等。

First, the distinction of names. Fascicle 72 and the Prakaraṇāryavācā fascicle 2 state that if they are spoken of without distinction generally as emptiness, wishlessness, and signlessness, their nature encompasses what is accomplished through hearing, thinking, and cultivation, whether contaminated or uncontaminated, whether in concentration or dispersed, being solely wholesome and not otherwise, being preparatory application and not innate. If spoken of as the samādhis of emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness, they are accomplished solely through cultivation, contaminated or uncontaminated, solely in concentration and not dispersed. If spoken of as the liberation doors of emptiness and so forth, they are solely uncontaminated prajñā accomplished through cultivation, not dispersed hearing, thinking, and so forth.