瑜伽師地論略纂 8.196

8.196

Where the treatise explains the reasoning of discursive inquiry, saying, “Such is called inquiring into principles through the reasoning of dependence on the conventional, the ultimate, and cause and condition”: what was explained previously as the absence of self within is the ultimate; furthermore, what was stated up to blueness, swelling, and so forth, up to skeleton, this is the conventional; now this body of mine, drawn by previous karma and afflictions and so forth, is the cause; born from the union of parents' impurities and so forth, is the condition. Here the conclusion follows the convenience of expression, not concluding in strict sequence. Alternatively, concluding in sequence can be understood by inference.