瑜伽師地論略纂 8.196

8.196

論解尋思理中云「如是名依世俗、勝義及以因緣觀待道理尋思於理」者，此前解內無我，是勝義；又如說言乃至謂青瘀等乃至骨鎖，此為世俗；今我此身，先業煩惱之所引等，是因；父母不淨和合生等，是緣。今結隨言便，非依次結。　又依次結，思准可知。

Where the treatise explains the reasoning of discursive inquiry, saying, “Such is called inquiring into principles through the reasoning of dependence on the conventional, the ultimate, and cause and condition”: what was explained previously as the absence of self within is the ultimate; furthermore, what was stated up to blueness, swelling, and so forth, up to skeleton, this is the conventional; now this body of mine, drawn by previous karma and afflictions and so forth, is the cause; born from the union of parents' impurities and so forth, is the condition. Here the conclusion follows the convenience of expression, not concluding in strict sequence. Alternatively, concluding in sequence can be understood by inference.