成唯識論述記 2.332

2.332

述曰：下有二難，此為厭色齊心難。論主將難，先牒彼義，但言入定，唯牒其定，不牒其果，例同破也。若入此二無心之位，有別實法異色、心等能礙於心，名無心定者，次下正難。

The Commentary states: Below there are two refutations; this is the refutation based on revulsion toward form matching that toward mind. As the author of the treatise is about to present the refutation, he first cites their position; he only mentions entering the absorption, citing only the absorption and not its fruit, refuting them as analogous. If, when entering these two mindless states, there were a distinct real entity different from form, mind, and so forth that could obstruct the mind and be called the mindless absorption, then the following directly refutes it.