成唯識論述記 2.332

2.332

The Commentary states: Below there are two refutations; this is the refutation based on revulsion toward form matching that toward mind. As the author of the treatise is about to present the refutation, he first cites their position; he only mentions entering the absorption, citing only the absorption and not its fruit, refuting them as analogous. If, when entering these two mindless states, there were a distinct real entity different from form, mind, and so forth that could obstruct the mind and be called the mindless absorption, then the following directly refutes it.