成唯識論述記 2.622

2.622

述曰：立比量云：同聚心所，非心親所緣，與心自體異故，如餘眼根等非所取法。此有二說：一說，設佛鏡智能現智影，自相應法亦非所緣，以自證分緣自體盡故，亦成遍智，見分之境、心等必同，自證分境許各別故。

The Commentary states: Constructing the syllogism: Mental factors of the same aggregation are not the direct objective condition of the citta; because they are distinct in substance from the citta; just like the remaining eye faculty and so forth, which are phenomena not apprehended [by it]. Regarding this there are two explanations: One explanation holds that even if the mirror-like wisdom (ādarśa-jñāna) of a Buddha can manifest an image of wisdom, its own associated phenomena are still not its objective condition, because the self-authenticating part (svasaṃvittibhāga) completely conditions its own substance. Thus, all-inclusive wisdom (sarvajñatā) is still accomplished. While the object of the darśanabhāga must be the same for the citta and its associates, the objects of their svasaṃvittibhāga are admitted to be distinct individually.