成唯識論述記 2.623

2.623

第二師說，鏡智相應心、心所法，亦許相緣，此但遮親，不遮疏也，於見分上佛現彼影，名遍智故。然一一自證分與相應法見分同境，名同所緣，非要皆見分方同所緣故。又遮親所緣，非即許彼為疎所緣，因明法爾。又上座等，心等不能自緣，唯緣相應法。

The second master says: The citta and caitasikas associated with the mirror-like wisdom are also admitted to condition one another; this only excludes direct [conditioning], not indirect [conditioning]. Because the Buddha manifests their image upon the darśanabhāga, it is called all-inclusive wisdom. However, that each svasaṃvittibhāga shares the same object with the darśanabhāga of its associated phenomena is called having a common objective condition; it is not necessary that they must all be the darśanabhāga to have a common objective condition. Furthermore, excluding a direct objective condition does not mean conceding that it is an indirect objective condition; this is the nature of hetuvidyā (logic). Moreover, according to the Sthaviras and others, citta and the like cannot condition themselves; they only condition associated phenomena.