成唯識論述記 3.241

3.241

述曰：下諸師說，初問後答，此為問也。雖知處所本識所緣，「誰異熟識變為此相」，問能變者。《瑜伽》等說，於外器皆無差別，於上界等，為是誰緣，故今問也。為凡為聖，為此趣、為他趣，為自界、為他界，為自地、為他地，為唯自變、為他亦變？自下護法菩薩假敘三計，初同月藏。

The Commentary states: Below are the assertions of various masters, first a question and then an answer; this is the question. Although knowing that the abode is the objective referent of the fundamental consciousness, 'whose ripening consciousness transforms into this aspect?' asks about the active transformer. The Yogācārabhūmi and other texts state that there is no distinction regarding the external receptacle; with respect to the higher realms and so forth, whose objective referent is it? Therefore, it is now asked: Is it ordinary beings or noble ones? Is it this destiny or another destiny? Is it one's own realm or another realm? Is it one's own stage or another stage? Is it transformed solely by oneself, or also transformed by others? Below, Bodhisattva Dharmapāla provisionally sets forth three positions; the first agrees with Candragarbha.