成唯識論述記 3.69

3.69

述曰：如沈麝等及如蒜薤等皆不受熏，亦如捨行之人，體性寬容，即能納事。若聰明、惡性皆不能容，且如善性非直，唯違不善，亦自違善，如沈不受檀等香故；惡等亦爾，故不可熏，而無記性不違善、惡，如捨行人不違事故。亦遮識類善等受熏，第七識內並非所熏，此同於後，唯是無覆無記中釋。

The Commentary states: Just as aloeswood, musk, garlic, scallions, and the like cannot receive perfuming; and also like a person of equanimous conduct whose nature is broad and tolerant, and can therefore accept matters. If one is clever or of an evil disposition, one cannot accommodate anything. Moreover, wholesome nature does not merely oppose what is unwholesome; it also opposes its own wholesome kind, just as aloeswood does not receive the scent of sandalwood; the same applies to evil and the like, and hence they cannot be perfumed. But the neutral nature does not oppose the wholesome or the unwholesome, just as an equanimous person does not oppose circumstances. This also excludes the class of consciousness that is wholesome and so forth from receiving perfuming; within the seventh consciousness, none are the perfumed. This is the same as what is explained later, only as unobstructed-neutral.