成唯識論述記 8.395

8.395

述曰：三會諸論。如《瑜伽》第十說：此十二支無因緣者，依增上所攝生起因故，彼下又云：取所攝業名勝分有等，諸論非一，此初會彼故，但總言有處。「唯說業種名有」者，此能正感異熟果故。五種雖正因能生，無力正感，故不名有，故第十說名勝分有。

The Commentary states: Third, reconciling the various treatises. As the tenth fascicle of the *Yogācāra* states: that these twelve factors lack direct causes is based on the generating causes subsumed under predominating [conditions]; below that it also says: the karma subsumed under grasping is called predominant-factor becoming, etc., in various treatises more than once. Here, first reconciling that text, it merely states generally 'in some places'. 'Solely the seeds of karma are named becoming' is because these are able to directly induce ripening fruits. Although the five seeds are direct causes able to produce [fruit], they have no power to directly induce it, and thus are not named 'becoming'; hence the tenth fascicle calls them 'predominant-factor becoming'.