成唯識論述記 5.670

5.670

The Commentary states: The Hīnayāna rescues its position by saying: Although the two periods of past and future do not exist in the present, there is prāpti present, and this is designated as establishing ātmagrāha. The refutation says: Since the periods that are obtained do not exist, the prāpti that obtains them cannot exist; because that which obtains does not exist, ātmagrāha is not established. Next, the four schools including the Mahāsāṃghika and Ekavyāvahārika, as well as the Mahīśāsaka and others, say: Distinct anuśayas are citta-viprayukta-saṃskāras; because they are possessed in this state, it is designated as establishing ātmagrāha.