成唯識論述記 7.72

7.72

The Commentary states: Below is the second master: they are definitely real. How is this known? Fascicle 55 only says that investigation and examination are provisionally existent; it does not state that these two are provisionally existent, and hence we know they are really existent. If so, why does it say they are conventional existents? That was spoken in accordance with external characteristics, because they are described as portions of delusion. It is not that saying they are "conventional" thereby demonstrates they are provisional, just as with torpor and the like, as established previously.