成唯識論掌中樞要 1.100

1.100

分別二執既不說總、別，即蘊之我二十句等，論唯說別，無總之文。此有二解：一、依文義，實無總。然未見文，但與前俱生不同，所以不說。二解實有總、別，與前同，故略而不論，如即蘊計我，豈簡總耶。此解為勝，離蘊之我，不說總、別。

Since the two discriminative clingings do not mention collective and separate, while the self identical to the aggregates in the twenty views and so forth is spoken of in the treatises only separately without any text on collective: there are two explanations for this. 1. Relying on the literal text, there is truly no collective. Yet no text has been seen, and it is merely different from the innate [clinging] mentioned previously, which is why it is not stated. 2. In reality there are both collective and separate, and being the same as the previous, it is omitted and not discussed; just as with the conception of self identical to the aggregates, how could it exclude the collective? This explanation is superior. For the self separate from the aggregates, collective and separate are not discussed.