成唯識論掌中樞要 1.110

1.110

第二、有法自相相違過。彼云：「有性離實有別自性；許異實故；如德業。」以有性為有法。今言：有性應非有性，故成有法自相相違，今舉無法為喻，亦成決定相違。

Second, the fallacy of contradiction with the proper nature of the subject (dharmi-svarūpa-viparīta-sādhana). They say: 'The nature of existence possesses a distinct intrinsic nature apart from substance; because it is accepted as being different from substance; like quality and action,' taking the nature of existence as the subject (dharmin). Now we say: the nature of existence ought to not be the nature of existence; hence it constitutes a contradiction with the proper nature of the subject. Now, adducing non-existent things as an example also constitutes a decisive contradiction (viruddhāvyabhicārin).