成唯識論掌中樞要 1.38

1.38

復有難言：「如剎帝利等具一切界，如是無般涅槃法，何故不有般涅槃法界耶」？應詰彼言：「有界、無界為互相違，為不爾耶？若互相違，而言無法，何故不有般涅槃法。不應道理，互相違故。若不相違，則此有情是無，亦有般涅槃法。不應正理，無別體故」。

Again, there is an objection that says: 'Just as a kṣatriya and the like possess all realms, why should one who is devoid of the dharma of parinirvāṇa not possess the realm of the dharma of parinirvāṇa?' One should cross-examine them, saying: 'Are having a realm and lacking a realm mutually contradictory, or are they not? If they are mutually contradictory, then saying "Why does one who lacks the dharma not have the dharma of parinirvāṇa?" is unreasonable, because they are mutually contradictory. If they are not contradictory, then this sentient being both lacks and possesses the dharma of parinirvāṇa. This is contrary to right principle, because there is no separate substantial entity.'