成唯識論掌中樞要 2.41

2.41

「生得善及意識業果起無雜」者，如生得善，雖此欲界亦有定屬；趣生名無雜，不爾，唯意業果無雜，此相從名，非實無雜。此解為正，通五趣得果故。意異熟者，此師不許諸趣轉受，唯本處歟，或多分故，亦有實異熟依異熟轉受故。「意中業果」是護法文，「生得善」者餘師義，合之一處，然非准的。

Regarding 'innate wholesomeness and the karmic fruits of the mental consciousness arising without confusion': as for innate wholesomeness, although in this desire realm it also has a fixed assignment, its destiny and birth are called non-confused; otherwise, only the karmic fruit of the mind is non-confused. This is a designated name through association, not truly non-confused. This explanation is correct, because it universally obtains its fruit across the five destinies. As for mental vipāka, this master does not accept interchangeable experience across destinies, but only in its original place; or, it is spoken according to the majority, since real vipāka is also experienced interchangeably based on vipāka. 'Karmic fruit in the mind' is the text of Dharmapāla; 'innate wholesomeness' is the position of other masters. They are combined in one place, but this is not the standard doctrine.