成唯識論掌中樞要 2.41

2.41

Regarding 'innate wholesomeness and the karmic fruits of the mental consciousness arising without confusion': as for innate wholesomeness, although in this desire realm it also has a fixed assignment, its destiny and birth are called non-confused; otherwise, only the karmic fruit of the mind is non-confused. This is a designated name through association, not truly non-confused. This explanation is correct, because it universally obtains its fruit across the five destinies. As for mental vipāka, this master does not accept interchangeable experience across destinies, but only in its original place; or, it is spoken according to the majority, since real vipāka is also experienced interchangeably based on vipāka. 'Karmic fruit in the mind' is the text of Dharmapāla; 'innate wholesomeness' is the position of other masters. They are combined in one place, but this is not the standard doctrine.