成唯識論了義燈 1.103

1.103

又難有五：一、為不了義得顯了故，如言此文有何義耶？二、語相違故，如言何故世尊先說與今說異？三、由道理相違故，如有顯示四種道理相違之義；四、不決定故，於一種義，於彼彼處，種種異門說故；五者究竟非現見故，如言內我有何體性？而言常恒，無有變易，如是正住等。今此設難，即第二、三。

Furthermore, objections are of five kinds: first, to clarify what is not definitive, as in saying, 'What is the meaning of this passage?'; second, due to contradiction in words, as in saying, 'Why is what the World-Honoured One said previously different from what he says now?'; third, due to contradiction in principle, as when showing the four kinds of contradiction in principle; fourth, due to non-determination, because a single meaning is spoken of through various different approaches in various places; fifth, because it is ultimately not directly seen, as in saying, 'What intrinsic nature does the internal self have, that it is said to be eternal, constant, without alteration, correctly abiding like this, etc.?' The objection raised here is of the second and third kinds.