成唯識論了義燈 1.50

1.50

有解：六門後之三門，即本前三。前之三門，即本第四性用別門。雖更開三，猶廣略失，准同有釋。然彼意，辨先寬，得後狹。又攝義歸名，亦少有失。非一切義皆是名攝。因名言故，名名言熏習，非即是名。

In the explanation of six gates, the latter three gates are precisely the original former three. The former three gates are precisely the fourth original gate of the distinction between nature and function. Although it further opens three, it still has the flaw of being too extensive or too brief, analogous to the aforementioned explanation. However, its intention was to define what is initially broader, attaining what is subsequently narrower. Furthermore, subsuming the referent into the name also has a slight flaw. Not all referents are subsumed by names. Because of nominal expressions, it is called the perfuming of nominal expression; it is not that it is identical with names.