成唯識論了義燈 2.109

2.109

《論》：故得於法俱為無用。二云，識所變不離有情，即非情法亦不離有情，無法名離有情法。初說有得，後即無得。問：既說無法即是無體，復說何法得名為離？答：以彼無法假名為離，非有無體名離有情，談無本性，不約識變，為無名離。

The treatise: 'Therefore, possession is completely useless for dharmas.' The second [view] states: What is transformed by consciousness is not separate from sentient beings; thus inanimate dharmas are also not separate from sentient beings. Non-existent dharmas are called dharmas separate from sentient beings. The former view says there is possession; the latter says there is no possession. Question: Since it is said that non-existent dharmas are devoid of essence, what dharma can be called 'separate'? Answer: That non-existent dharma is nominally called 'separate'; it is not that having a non-essence is called being separate from sentient beings. Speaking of the original nature of non-existence, not in terms of transformation by consciousness, being non-existent is called 'separate.'