成唯識論了義燈 2.153

2.153

問：何不通依俱生障立？答：約全能障見、修無漏，俱生立全障二無漏故，不依立故。《瑜伽論》五十六云：依未生起，一切出世聖法分位，建立異生性，此論亦言見所斷種，未永害位，假立非得名異生性。問：依見斷種立異生性為，總依三界見斷種立為，不爾耶？

Question: Why is it not comprehensively established on the basis of innate obstructions? Answer: In terms of entirely obstructing the uncontaminated [paths] of vision and cultivation, the innate [obstructions] are established as entirely obstructing both uncontaminated [paths], hence it is not established on their basis. *Yogācāra-bhūmi* fascicle fifty-six says: 'Established on the basis of the state wherein all supramundane noble dharmas have not arisen is the nature of an ordinary person.' This treatise also says: 'Conventionally establishing non-possession at the stage where seeds abandoned by vision have not yet been perpetually destroyed is called the nature of an ordinary person.' Question: Is establishing the nature of an ordinary person on the basis of seeds abandoned by vision established collectively on the basis of seeds abandoned by vision in all three realms, or is it not so?