成唯識論了義燈 3.72

3.72

《論》：云此遮異熟心、心所等者，舉異熟無記，等取威儀工巧業所感者心心所法。及此等心、心所、心所帶相分，俱不能熏，為非業感心、心所法，緣變影熏一切不遮。故言第二解勝。異熟能熏，但等取劣，道理無據。

The Treatise says: 'This excludes the mind, mental factors, etc., of fruition (vipāka).' This cites fruition unspecified nature (vipākāvyākṛta), and 'etc.' includes the mind and mental factors karmically induced among deportment and technical craft. As well as these minds, mental factors, and the reflex images carried by these mental factors, none are capable of perfuming; as for minds and mental factors that are not karmically induced, their cognizing and manifesting reflex images to perfume is not at all precluded. Therefore, to say the second interpretation is superior—that fruition can perfume, with 'etc.' only including the inferior—is logically unfounded.