成唯識論了義燈 4.112

4.112

《論》言要緣曾受境類者。有二說：一云，境類者。緣滅、道時但緣其名，名亦為境，此境是滅、道類；二云，境體之類，如緣苦、集，親符其體，亦已曾受後復緣時，言緣境類，即前體類，餘准此釋。又云，名是名類，謂先聞緣，今復聞緣；二名是體之類，謂先見體，今復緣名；三體是體之類；四體是名之類。准前可解。

Regarding the treatise's statement, "It must take the category of previously experienced objects": There are two explanations. One says: "The category of objects" means that when taking cessation and the path as objects, it only takes their names as objects; a name is also an object, and this object is of the category of cessation and the path. The second says: It is of the category of the entity of the object, as when taking suffering and origination as objects, it directly tallies with their entity; having also been previously experienced, when taking them as object again later, it is called taking the category of objects, which is the aforementioned category of the entity; the rest should be understood by analogy to this. Furthermore, it is said: A name is a category of name, meaning having previously heard and taken it as object, now one hears and takes it as object again; second, a name is a category of entity, meaning having previously seen the entity, now one takes the name as object again; third, an entity is a category of entity; fourth, an entity is a category of name. These can be understood by analogy to the preceding.