成唯識論了義燈 4.37

4.37

《論》：彼特違害者，據勝義諦非空不空。今謂皆空故，特違前集起心經。又《仁王般若》云：有無本自二，即辨世諦，何得依勝義，立一切皆空？雖亦違前《楞伽》、《深密》。在此證明即違此經，破無為量准前辨。

The treatise says: "It especially contradicts..." This is based on the ultimate truth being neither empty nor non-empty. Now [Bhāviveka] claims that all is empty, hence it especially contradicts the earlier sūtra on the accumulating mind. Furthermore, the Benevolent King Prajñā Sūtra says: "Existence and non-existence are fundamentally two"; this explains conventional truth—how can one rely on the ultimate truth to establish that all is empty? Although it also contradicts the earlier Laṅkāvatāra and Saṃdhinirmocana, since it is cited here as proof, it contradicts this sūtra. The inference refuting unconditioned phenomena should be evaluated according to the preceding [discussion].