成唯識論了義燈 4.70

4.70

《論》：「若無此識持業果」下。應分其文云：若無此識持業種，一、界地往還，後業起應無因；二、異類法後，業起應無因；三、性心易不受彼熏，故業起無因。破業果亦分二：一、界地往還，果起無因；二、異類法後，果起無因。《攝論》中亦云：若異熟斷已，而更別生，應成別受生失，無漏心後果起無因，又滅二趣，如本《疏》辨。

Regarding the passage in the Treatise from "If there were no this consciousness to hold the fruit of karma" downward: the text should be divided as follows. If there were no this consciousness to hold the seeds of karma: first, when moving back and forth between realms and stages, the subsequent arising of karma would lack a cause; second, after heterogeneous phenomena, the arising of karma would lack a cause; third, minds of different natures change and do not receive their perfuming, so the arising of karma would lack a cause. Refuting the fruit of karma is also divided into two: first, when moving back and forth between realms and stages, the arising of the fruit would lack a cause; second, after heterogeneous phenomena, the arising of the fruit would lack a cause. The Mahāyānasaṃgraha also states: If the vipāka were cut off and then arose distinctly again, it would incur the fault of taking distinct rebirths; after an uncontaminated mind, the arising of the fruit would lack a cause; and furthermore, the two destinies would be destroyed, as explained in the primary commentary.