成唯識論了義燈 5.212

5.212

無相分別但緣未來，計度分別通緣三世，文雖不言與三相攝，實計度攝，以緣未來，非初二攝。計度小分故計度攝，後四皆是計度所攝。彼《論》釋云：所餘分別，皆用計度分別，以為自性。所以者何？以思度故，或時尋求，或時伺察，或時染污，或不染污，三中據總合之為一，七中約別故離為四。以此准知，後四皆通緣於三世唯是尋、伺。彼云：以思度故前三不定，寬狹而言七寬三狹，據遍行相，唯識等說任運即是自性所攝。有漏心、心所，因循取境異無漏故，名為分別。是心、心所本自性故，名為自性。自性即分別，又自性言亦通境說。《雜集論》云：如所緣相無異分別，於自境界任運轉故，即自性之分別，名自性分別。故知任運亦自性攝。

Discrimination without signs takes only the future as its object. Calculating discrimination takes all three times as its object. Although the text does not state how it is mutually subsumed with the three, it is in fact subsumed under calculating [discrimination], because, taking the future as its object, it is not subsumed under the first two. Being a minor portion of calculating [discrimination], it is therefore subsumed under calculating [discrimination]. The last four are all subsumed under calculating discrimination. That treatise explains: 'The remaining discriminations all have calculating discrimination as their intrinsic nature. Why? Because of conceptualizing, it sometimes seeks, sometimes investigates, sometimes is defiled, or is undefiled.' Among the three, based on the general, they are united into one; among the seven, based on the particular, they are divided into four. From this one may infer that the last four all generally take the three times as their object and are solely vitarka and vicāra. It says: 'Because of conceptualizing, the preceding three are not fixed.' In terms of breadth and narrowness, the seven are broad and the three are narrow. According to the pervasive ākāra, treatises like the Vijñapti-mātra state that the spontaneous is subsumed under intrinsic-nature [discrimination]. Sāsrava minds and mental factors, habitually taking objects in a manner distinct from the anāsrava, are called discrimination. Because this is the original intrinsic nature of the minds and mental factors, it is called intrinsic nature. The intrinsic nature is itself discrimination; furthermore, the word 'intrinsic nature' also pertains to the object. The Abhidharmasamuccaya says: 'Spontaneously operating upon one's own sphere without different discriminations regarding the signs of the observed object', which is the discrimination of intrinsic nature, called intrinsic-nature discrimination. Therefore we know that spontaneous [discrimination] is also subsumed under intrinsic nature.