成唯識論了義燈 5.30

5.30

問：定中身識亦得起不？答：有二解。一云：不得，准前第三云：謂若在定等，理有眾多身受生起等，故無身識。若爾前云：諸定皆無五識身故，何故定中說有耳識？答：前據他宗。若爾猶有比量相違？一云：許起無失，若諸菩薩五識皆起，二乘不定。問：在無所有處定意緣聲時，與耳同熏欲界之聲，為無所有處？答：定心所變屬能緣心，不同耳識。

Question: Can tactile consciousness also arise within absorption? Answer: There are two explanations. One says: it cannot. According to the earlier Fascicle Three, which says: "That is to say, when in absorption and the like, by principle there are manifold bodily sensations arising, etc.," thus there is no tactile consciousness. If so, why was it said earlier that in all absorptions there is no group of five consciousnesses, yet it is said that in absorption there is auditory consciousness? Answer: The earlier statement was based on other schools. If so, is there still a contradiction with inferential reasoning? One says: to grant that it arises entails no fault; for bodhisattvas, all five consciousnesses arise, whereas for the two vehicles it is indefinite. Question: When the manovijñāna in the absorption of the sphere of nothingness cognizes sound, perfuming sound of the desire realm together with the ear, is it of the sphere of nothingness? Answer: What is transformed by the mind of absorption pertains to the cognizing mind, unlike the auditory consciousness.