成唯識論了義燈 5.9

5.9

《論》：此位染意。《疏》云：通二執說。《要集》等說，唯說人執，不說法執。何以故？若說法執，何故《論》言三乘聖道有伏滅義，二乘無學不應永捨？又護法釋：三位無者，依染意說。故知法執不名染意。令謂但說於《論》不違，是本意故。雖定性二乘不能伏斷，望彼非染，不名染意。對不定性及定大乘，法執名染。然不定性生空聖道亦不能伏，故《論》云：三乘聖道有伏滅義。若唯人執，應言三乘聖道俱能伏滅，何須得言有？三位無染亦復無過，法執望二乘定性不名染，三位中不無。若望菩薩三位中無，文含義隱，餘者不悉。

The treatise says: "At this state, defiled manas..." The Commentary says: "This is spoken of as pervading both graspings." The Yaoji and others say: "It speaks only of the grasping of self, not of the grasping of phenomena. Why? If it spoke of the grasping of phenomena, why would the treatise say that the sacred paths of the three vehicles have the function of subduing and eradicating it, since the non-learners of the two vehicles should not abandon it forever? Furthermore, Dharmapāla's explanation that it is absent in the three states is spoken with reference to defiled manas. Thus we know that the grasping of phenomena is not called defiled manas." Now I maintain that merely stating this does not contradict the treatise and is its primary intention. Although the two vehicles of determined nature cannot subdue or sever it, viewed from their perspective it is not defiled, and is not called defiled manas. But in contrast to those of indeterminate nature and the determined Mahāyāna, the grasping of phenomena is called defiled. Yet the sacred path of the emptiness of persons of the indeterminate nature also cannot subdue it; thus the treatise states: "The sacred paths of the three vehicles have the function of subduing and eradicating it." If it were solely the grasping of self, it should say that the sacred paths of the three vehicles can both subdue and eradicate it; why would it need to say "have"? That there is no defilement in the three states is also without fault: the grasping of phenomena, viewed from the perspective of the two vehicles of determined nature, is not called defiled, and is not absent in the three states. But viewed from the perspective of bodhisattvas, it is absent in the three states. The text is comprehensive and its meaning subtle; the rest do not know this thoroughly.