成唯識論了義燈 6.122

6.122

《論》：「若無緣用」等者。難安惠師，佛菩薩智，亦非智品，無見分能緣用故，如虛空等。護法可爾，難陀如何？唯一見分，更無別用故。安惠却誥，若要有用，方是能緣，應有無窮過，見分不起能緣之用，應不能緣。解云：准此非難陀難，但護法等。若爾，亦有無窮之過，若見能緣，不更有用。應有不定。答：無無窮過，以見分用從體，亦能非須作用。

Treatise: 'If it lacks the function of taking an object, etc.' This objects to Master Harivarman / Sthiramati: the wisdom of Buddhas and bodhisattvas would also not belong to the category of wisdom, because it lacks the cognitive function of the seeing division, like empty space, etc. This may be so for Dharmapāla, but how about Nanda? For he holds only a seeing division and no separate function. Sthiramati retorts: If it requires a function to be cognitive, there would be the fault of infinite regress; if the seeing division does not generate a cognitive function, it should be incapable of cognition. The explanation says: According to this, it is not an objection by Nanda, but only Dharmapāla and others. If so, there is also the fault of infinite regress: if the seeing division can cognize without further having a function, there should be an indeterminacy. Answer: There is no fault of infinite regress, because the function of the seeing division derives from its essence and is itself capable, without requiring an [additional] operation.