成唯識論了義燈 6.77

6.77

答：有二解：一云、由無明為先，不了外境增上果故，發起於受。受為緣生愛，非緣受起愚，而言境界所生受果愚者，由愚是彼境界果受之因故。論言：由第二境界所生受果愚故，起緣境界受愛，不言境界愚愛故。前第四云：唯無明受為緣生愛，此非受支。一云，由此第二境界所生受之迷，增上果愚。意云此境界所生受，是迷外增上果愚之所生，即說此受由境及愚二力所生故，即由第二境界所生受因境所生，又取受字云受果愚，即因愚起舉果顯因，云第二境界所生受果愚，正說應云：迷外增上果境界愚為緣起受，受彼外果，方起愛、取故。前云：受二種先業果，謂受內異熟果，及境界所生受增上果。此意云：境界所生受，受外增上果，不得說境是受之果。論云：受二種先業果故。又九十三云：復由第二境界所生增上果愚，緣境界受，發生貪愛，此即直明。

Answer: There are two explanations. One says: Taking ignorance as the antecedent, through failing to understand external objects as adhipati-phala (dominant fruits), feeling is initiated. Feeling serves as the condition to produce craving; it is not that delusion arises taking feeling as its object. As for the expression 'delusion regarding the fruit of feeling produced by objects', it is because delusion is the cause of that feeling which is the fruit of objects. The treatise states: 'Because of the second [kind of delusion], delusion regarding the fruit of feeling produced by objects, one initiates craving for feeling that takes objects as its condition', and does not say 'delusion regarding objects [generates] craving'. Earlier, in fascicle 4, it states: 'Only ignorance and feeling serve as conditions to produce craving; this is not the feeling limb.' Another says: It is through the delusion [regarding] feeling produced by these second objects—delusion regarding dominant fruits. The meaning is that this feeling produced by objects is generated by delusion that is confused about external dominant fruits; that is, it is stated that this feeling is produced by the combined force of the object and delusion. Thus, it is produced by the cause/object of the feeling generated by the second object. Furthermore, taking the character 'feeling' (shou) to say 'delusion regarding the fruit of feeling' is to point out the cause by adducing the fruit that arose from the delusion, saying 'delusion regarding the fruit of feeling produced by the second objects'. Strictly stated, one should say: Taking as a condition delusion regarding objects that are confused about external dominant fruits, feeling arises; feeling that external fruit, one only then initiates craving and grasping. Earlier it states: 'Feeling has two kinds of fruits of prior karma, namely, feeling the internal vipāka fruit, and the dominant fruit of feeling produced by objects.' This means: Feeling produced by objects experiences external dominant fruits; one must not say that the object is the fruit of feeling, because the treatise states: 'Feeling has two kinds of fruits of prior karma.' Furthermore, fascicle 93 states: 'Further, through the second [kind of delusion], delusion regarding dominant fruits produced by objects, taking feeling of objects as condition, one generates greedy craving.' This explains it directly.