成唯識論了義燈 6.82

6.82

答：見戒取等雖緣事生，何妨見惑？二云，迷惡道苦為俗愚，迷人天苦為勝義，此釋為正，然俱諦攝。而《雜集》第七云：愚內異熟真實義，真實義即四聖諦者，然迷世俗，得其總名，云內異熟，迷真實義者微細，故云真義，即四聖諦。據四聖諦亦攝內異熟，內異熟亦攝真實義，互舉總義。

Answer: Although views, grasping of rules and vows, and the like arise taking concrete affairs as objects, how does this prevent them from being defilements of view? A second [explanation] says: Confusion regarding suffering in the evil destinies is conventional delusion; confusion regarding suffering in the human and celestial realms is ultimate [delusion]. This explanation is correct, yet both are subsumed under the truths. And the Abhidharmasamuccaya-vyākhyā, fascicle 7, states: 'Delusion regarding the true meaning of internal vipāka; the true meaning is the four noble truths.' However, confusion regarding the conventional truth receives its general name, being called 'internal vipāka'; confusion regarding the true meaning is subtle, so it is called 'the true meaning', which is the four noble truths. In terms of the four noble truths, they also subsume internal vipāka; internal vipāka also subsumes the true meaning. Each presents the general meaning.