成唯識論了義燈 7.110

7.110

《要集》難云：「若由說纏即說縛者，如何論師引彼經頌，證成有漏、無漏四分？無漏無縛非證無漏。今者為通：且據有漏證有四分，顯知無漏亦有四分。若說言縛不得證無漏，亦應說眾生言不得證佛有。」

The Yaoji objects: "If being spoken of as entanglement means being spoken of as bondage, how could the treatise master cite that sutra verse to substantiate the four aspects of contaminated and uncontaminated? The uncontaminated has no bondage, so it would not substantiate the uncontaminated. Now, to resolve this: It provisionally substantiates the existence of the four aspects on the basis of the contaminated, clearly indicating that the uncontaminated also has four aspects. If speaking of bondage means it cannot substantiate the uncontaminated, then speaking of sentient beings would likewise mean it cannot substantiate the existence of the Buddha."