成唯識論了義燈 7.148

7.148

今謂：不爾。四勝進道應頓斷中加，漸斷之中准有釋有。又可許各一品中，頓斷只得有四，漸斷有五。三心見道二無間、一解脫過亦同前，應三十四釋。今者義准合三十九，各二、三品中漸、頓各六釋，成二十四。各一品中共有九釋，如前准知。三心見道，合有六釋。後無間道為前解脫釋中，於斷下品煩惱障已，亦起勝進。或除相望無間、解脫，但於別起無間、解脫。斷下煩惱，欲斷所知，起一勝進，為一解。又斷中品起一勝進，趣總斷道，亦為一解。

I now say: this is not so. Four viśeṣamārgas should be added in abrupt severance; in gradual severance, by analogy, some interpretations have them and some do not. Moreover, it may be granted that in each single grade, abrupt severance can only have four, while gradual severance has five. In the three-mind path of seeing, the fault of two ānantaryamārgas and one vimuktimārga is also the same as before; there should be thirty-four explanations. Now, inferred from principle, there should be thirty-nine in total: in each of the two and three grades, gradual and abrupt each have six explanations, making twenty-four. In each single grade there are nine explanations in total, which may be understood by analogy with the preceding. In the three-mind path of seeing, there are six explanations in total. In the interpretation where a subsequent ānantaryamārga serves as the preceding vimuktimārga, upon having severed the lower grade of affliction-hindrance, a viśeṣamārga is also generated. Or, setting aside the mutually oriented ānantarya- and vimuktimārgas, it only pertains to separately generated ānantarya- and vimuktimārgas: having severed the lower affliction, desiring to sever the knowable-[hindrance], generating one viśeṣamārga makes one interpretation. Furthermore, having severed the middling grade, generating one viśeṣamārga to proceed to the path of general severance also makes one interpretation.