成唯識論了義燈 7.147

7.147

今謂：不爾。三心見道初二無間，第三解脫，與前各一三心何別？應除此解，三十二釋。《要集》云：「此皆未盡，於一品頓斷之中合有四：即一無間斷惑證滅義說為二，只是一心，入相見時起一勝進，故為四解。又三、二、一各別斷中，從斷煩惱欲斷所知各起勝進，即加三勝進。於有解三十三釋中，除三心見道二釋，但存五釋。於無間後不許起勝進，但取二心無間、一心解脫，合三十一。加勝進四：一品頓斷中加一，漸斷之中一、二、三品各加於一，合三十六釋。於中一、二、三品各十有釋，三心見道有其六釋。」

I now say: this is not so. In the three-mind path of seeing, the first two are ānantaryamārgas and the third is a vimuktimārga; how does this differ from the three minds for each single grade mentioned before? This interpretation should be excluded, leaving thirty-two explanations. The Yaoji says: "All of these are still not exhaustive. In the abrupt severance of a single grade, there should be four [interpretations]: namely, the meaning of severing afflictions and realizing cessation in a single ānantaryamārga is explained as two, which is merely a single mind, and upon entering the path of seeing as likeness a viśeṣamārga is generated, thus making four explanations. Furthermore, in the separate severance of the three, two, and one grades, from the severance of the affliction-hindrance to the desire to sever the knowable-[hindrance], each generates a viśeṣamārga, which adds three viśeṣamārgas. From the thirty-three explanations held by [that] interpretation, excluding the two explanations of the three-mind path of seeing, only five explanations are retained. Since after an ānantaryamārga it is not permitted to generate a viśeṣamārga, merely taking two minds of ānantaryamārga and one mind of vimuktimārga makes thirty-one. Adding four viśeṣamārgas—adding one in the abrupt severance of a single grade, and adding one to each of the one, two, and three grades in gradual severance—makes thirty-six explanations in total. Among them, the one, two, and three grades each have ten-odd explanations, and the three-mind path of seeing has its six explanations."