成唯識論了義燈 7.204

7.204

諸經論中所說十障及二十二愚，名字少異，義意多同。然《要集》云：「十障與愚互相攝者，應作四句。有障非愚，第四微細煩惱現行障，定、法二愚不攝彼障。」今謂：不爾。下論解言：「身見等言亦攝無始所知障，攝定愛、法愛。」准知此愚亦即是障，以「等」言攝，論明說故。

The ten obstacles and twenty-two delusions taught in various sūtras and treatises differ slightly in name, but their conceptual intent is mostly the same. However, the Yaoji says: "If the ten obstacles and the delusions mutually subsume one another, four alternatives should be constructed. There are obstacles that are not delusions: the fourth obstacle, which is the manifest activity of subtle defilements; the two delusions of concentration and dharmas do not subsume that obstacle." I now say: This is not so. The treatise below explains: "The words 'view of self' and so forth also subsume the beginningless cognitive obstacle, subsuming attachment to concentration and attachment to dharmas." By this one should know that this delusion is also indeed an obstacle, being subsumed by the word "and so forth", as the treatise explicitly states.