成唯識論了義燈 7.231

7.231

《論》：「此十一障」等。本疏言「體性寬、狹，更無別異」者，非唯十一障，以十種障各舉初斷，影顯住、出所斷障故。《疏》云：「十地所斷雖但所知，俱品不行，即通二障。」非唯十一初所斷者，《論》意如是。本明斷障得果，唯斷十一，非但斷不成，亦不能得果。故下論文總分別斷，非為不知十一不攝住、出斷者。

Treatise: "These eleven obstacles..." and so forth. Where the Root Commentary says that "in intrinsic nature, whether broad or narrow, there is no further distinction," this does not pertain only to the eleven obstacles, because by adducing the initial severance of each of the ten obstacles, it implicitly indicates the obstacles severed during abiding and exiting. The Commentary says: "Although what is severed on the ten grounds is only the cognizable [obstacle], since its concomitant categories do not operate, this applies to both obstacles." That it is not merely the initial severances of the eleven—this is the intention of the treatise. Its original intention is to explain the severance of obstacles to attain the fruits; if one severed only the eleven, not only would severance be incomplete, but one could also not attain the fruits. Therefore, the subsequent text of the treatise analyzes their severance in general, not because it was unaware that the eleven do not encompass the severances during abiding and exiting.