成唯識論了義燈 7.93

7.93

若爾，何故《攝論》復云「於繩謂蛇智，見繩了義無」等？准此，即先悟依他、次悟遍計。

If so, why does the Mahāyānasaṃgraha further state: "Regarding the perception of a snake in a rope, seeing the rope, one comprehends that the referent is nonexistent," and so forth? According to this, one would first awaken to the other-dependent nature, and next awaken to the imagined nature.