成唯識論演祕 1.395

1.395

詳曰：世間、聖教皆明我、法，何故多文唯說世間我、法二耶？又准何理知但明彼世間我、法耶？縱亦明彼聖教我、法，違何文理？故《疏》正也，義周備故。

Examination: Both worldly conventions and the noble teachings clarify self and dharmas; why would many passages only speak of worldly self and dharmas? Furthermore, based on what principle does one know that it only clarifies those worldly self and dharmas? Even if it also clarifies the self and dharmas of the noble teachings, what text or principle would it violate? Therefore, the Commentary is correct, because its meaning is comprehensive.