成唯識論演祕 1.453

1.453

答：有二釋，一云：先以量成令蘊無常，然後為喻。量云：蘊定無常；待眾緣故；如瓶盆等。又若彼立蘊為常者，有違世間，世間共知蘊無常故。二云：彼雖計我體即是蘊，許無常我即名常。

Answer: There are two explanations. The first says: One first establishes by a syllogism to make the aggregates impermanent, and then uses them as an example. The syllogism runs: The aggregates are definitely impermanent; because they depend on multiple conditions; like jars, basins, and the like. Furthermore, if they posited that the aggregates are permanent, it would contradict the world, because the world universally knows that the aggregates are impermanent. The second says: Although they posit that the substance of the self is identical to the aggregates, they admit that the impermanent self is precisely termed permanent.