成唯識論演祕 1.541

1.541

有義：俱生我見行相微細，如何超果說見道斷？若言助伴先有漏伏，理亦不然，相應貪等我見行同，如何說伴前有漏伏？若伏相應，我見應爾，行相同故。《對法》等說超初、二果，隨轉理門，非大乘義。

An opinion states: The ākāra of the innate view of self is subtle; how could it be said to be abandoned in the path of vision when transcending the fruitions? If one says that its companions were previously suppressed by the sāsrava, the principle is also not so: associated greed and the like have the same ākāra as the view of self, so how could it be said that the companions were previously suppressed by the sāsrava? If the associated ones were suppressed, the view of self should also be so, because their ākāras are the same. When the Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣya and others speak of transcending the first and second fruitions, that is adapting to the provisional doctrine, not the Mahāyāna meaning.