成唯識論演祕 1.65

1.65

詳曰：理未必然。現處因位，力云何滿？設自德滿可無初分，何無第三？又復世親《三十唯識》亦但正說，豈亦力圓？故非善會。

Analysis: In principle, this is not necessarily so. While currently abiding in the causal stage, how could his power be complete? Even granting that his own virtues were complete and thus he might lack the initial section, why would he lack the third? Furthermore, Vasubandhu's Triṃśikā-vijñapti also has only the correct exposition; could it be that his power was also complete? Therefore, this is not a good understanding.