成唯識論演祕 1.716

1.716

詳曰：後說為勝，有依憑故。或不相攝，理亦無過。若依實等即實等攝，德亦依實應亦實收，此既不收，彼云何攝？又彼論中無相攝處。

An examination shows: The latter explanation is superior, because it has supporting authority. Or else, that they do not subsume each other is also logically flawless. If by relying on substance and so forth they are subsumed under substance and so forth, then qualities also rely on substances and should also be subsumed under substances; yet since these are not so subsumed, how could those be subsumed? Furthermore, in that treatise there is no place where mutual subsumption is taught.