成唯識論演祕 2.545

2.545

詳曰：定道無表理容可然，別脫無表如何依現？又若意境即同法處，色等屈曲自亦意境，應唯法處，故知非也。

Detailed evaluation: With avijñapti of concentration and the Path, this is logically plausible, but how could prātimokṣa-avijñapti be based on the active? Moreover, if being an object of the manas means being in the same dharmāyatana, the flexure of form and so forth is itself also an object of the manas and should be solely in the dharmāyatana; thus we know this is incorrect.