成唯識論演祕 2.57

2.57

答：意取識變一邊為證。有義破云：《疏》說此說所緣之境是識所變，非外微成，今不依此。若已顯境是內識變，何故次下復云眼等外所緣緣理非有耶？明知此文但顯五根是識所變。

Answer: The intent is to take the side of consciousness's transformation as proof. A certain opinion refutes this, saying: "The Commentary says that this passage states that the object cognized is transformed by consciousness and is not formed of external atoms; we do not rely on this now. If it has already shown that the object is transformed by internal consciousness, why does it then say below that the external objective condition of the eyes, etc., is logically non-existent? It is clear that this passage merely shows that the five faculties are transformed by consciousness."