成唯識論演祕 2.58

2.58

詳曰：談何容易而見彈斥，《疏》何有云此說所緣豈不自加？又《疏》前科分明自指根、境等別，明《疏》不謬，當審尋之。

Detailed analysis: How can one so easily dismiss and criticize? Where does the Commentary say "this passage states that the object..."? Is this not an addition of one's own? Furthermore, the preceding division of topics in the Commentary clearly points out the distinction between faculties and fields, etc., showing that the Commentary is not mistaken; this should be examined closely.