成唯識論演祕 3.105

3.105

此質意云：若假是無，故不須簡，無為應爾亦不須簡。真如無為，善言攝故，非擇滅等同生等故。雖善等攝，猶更別簡，假法雖無，遮亦何失？

The intent of this challenge is: If nominal dharmas are non-existent and thus need not be excluded, unconditioned dharmas (asaṃskṛta) should likewise not need to be excluded. True Suchness and the unconditioned are subsumed under the term 'wholesome', and cessation not through deliberation (apratisaṃkhyā-nirodha) and so forth are identical to arising, etc. Although they are subsumed under wholesome, etc., they are still distinctly excluded; even though nominal dharmas are non-existent, what fault is there in negating them?